nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2021, 06, v.23 38-45
网络直播用工劳动关系认定研究
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.16452/j.cnki.sdkjsk.2021.06.002
摘要:

网络直播用工关系纷繁复杂,司法实践中主要依据《关于确立劳动关系有关事项的通知》将网络直播用工关系认定为平等民事关系,使得大部分网络主播权益未得到充分保障。第三产业发展的显著特点即灵活就业普遍化,传统劳动关系认定方式已经难以适应灵活就业环境,从而陷入了网络直播用工系劳动关系还是民事关系的认定困境。网络直播用工关系的性质认定,应综合考量网络直播用工模式、劳动关系从属性标准及网络主播权益社会保护必要性等因素。可以将网络直播用工关系划分为标准劳动关系、非标准劳动关系和劳务关系三种类型,对不同用工模式下的网络主播进行全面保护,从而实现网络主播与直播平台之间权益的平衡。

Abstract:

The employment relationship via live webcast is growing increasingly more complex. In judicial practice, the employment relationship via live webcast is recognized as an equal civil relationship in accordance with the Notice on Matters Concerning the Establishment of Labor Relationship, which fails to fully protect the rights and interests of most network anchors. The tertiary industry is featured with the generalization of flexible employment, and the traditional way to recognize labor relationship is hard to adapt to the flexible employment environment, thus falling into the dilemma of recognizing the labor relationship in the live webcast as the civil relationship. To determine the nature of the employment relationship via live webcast, comprehensive consideration should be given to the webcasting employment models, labor relationship subordination standards, and the social necessity to protect the rights and interests of network anchors. The webcast employment relationship can be divided into three types: standard labor relationship, non-standard labor relationship and labor service relationship, so as to fully protect the network anchors under different employment models and realize the balance of the rights and interests between the network anchors and the live broadcast platforms.

参考文献

[1]王全兴,刘琦.我国新经济下灵活用工的特点、挑战和法律规制[J].法学评论,2019(4):85.

[2]王天玉.超越“劳动二分法”:平台用工法律调整的基本立场[J].中国劳动关系学院学报,2020(4):77.

[3]董兴佩.法益:法律的中心问题[J].北方法学,2008(3):30-32.

[4]班小辉.“零工经济”下任务化用工的劳动法规制[J].法学评论,2019(3):114.

[5]COUNTOURIS N.The changing law of the employment relationship:Comparative analyses in the European context[M].Aldershot:Ashgate Publishing,2007:72.

[6]SORGE S.German law on dependent self-employed workers:A comparison to the current situation under Spanish law[J].Comparative labor law and policy journal,2010(2):249-250.

[7]陈晓宁.论非标准劳动关系的法律规制[J].时代法学,2010(3):70.

[8]董保华.论非标准劳动关系[J].学术研究,2008(7):51.

[9]谢德成.新时代劳动法的功能拓展与制度调适[J].当代法学,2019(4):109.

[10]周国良.劳动法律体系亟待完善与重构[J].中国法律评论,2018(6):138.

[11]李干.试论劳动法的社会法特质[J].中国劳动关系学院学报,2019(4):16.

[12]涂永前.应对灵活用工的劳动法制度重构[J].中国法学,2018(5):228.

[13]BOGG A L.Sham self-employment in the supreme court[J].Industrial law journal,2012(3):331.

[14]肖竹.第三类劳动者的理论反思与替代路径[J].环球法律评论,2018(6):80.

(1)“标准劳动关系”与前文“传统劳动关系”内涵一致,各自在不同语境下使用。

(2)参见青橙美联(大连)文化传媒有限公司与李东苹合同纠纷案,大连市西岗区人民法院(2020)辽0203民初2612号民事判决书。

(1)检索时间为2021年4月16日。

基本信息:

DOI:10.16452/j.cnki.sdkjsk.2021.06.002

中图分类号:D922.5

引用信息:

[1]董兴佩,李明倩.网络直播用工劳动关系认定研究[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(06):38-45.DOI:10.16452/j.cnki.sdkjsk.2021.06.002.

检 索 高级检索